사업정지
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a petroleum retailer operating a gas station (hereinafter “instant gas station”) with the trade name “C gas station” in Gyeyang-si B.
B. On May 4, 2018, the former North Korea Institute: (a) collected samples from the passage partitions of a mobile-sale vehicle (D, 300L Home Ri, hereinafter “instant vehicle”); and (b) conducted the quality inspection of the samples; (c) confirmed that approximately 10% of other petroleum products, such as automobile transit oil, etc., were mixed with the said samples; and (d) notified the Defendant of the petroleum products stored in the said vehicle as fake petroleum products prescribed in subparagraph 10 of Article 2 of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act (hereinafter “petroleum Business Act”). < Amended by Act No. 1530, May 21, 2018>
C. On May 24, 2018, the Plaintiff submitted an objection to the inspection of the quality of petroleum products to the Defendant on the ground that he/she was unable to trust the above inspection results, and the Defendant delivered this to the former North Korea Institute, but the former North Korea Institute of the Korea Institute of the former North Korea Institute was found to have conducted a reinspection on June 7, 2018.
I responded to the same effect as the result of the ruling in the paragraph.
On July 25, 2018, the Defendant issued a disposition of suspension of business 1.5 months (45 days, August 14, 2018 to September 27, 2018) and publication of a violation (from August 14, 2018 to November 13, 2018) on the ground that “the Plaintiff stored and stored fake petroleum products in violation of Article 29(1)1 of the Petroleum Business Act” (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant disposition”).
E. On July 31, 2018, the Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed an administrative appeal seeking the revocation of the instant disposition with the Standing Committee on Administrative Appeals (Seoul-do). However, the Standing Committee on Administrative Appeals (Seoul-do) rendered a ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s petition on October 1, 2018.
F. On May 4, 2018, the Plaintiff’s suspect is an erroneous tank for the instant vehicle, which is a mobile-sale vehicle in the instant gas station.