2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant agreed with the victims, such circumstances are considered in full at the court below, and there is no change of circumstances at the court below, on the other hand, each of the crimes of this case has been punished several times in light of the type of crime and the degree of damage, and the defendant has committed each of the crimes of this case without being informed of the crime during the period of probation, and there is no sufficient circumstance after the crime, such as the execution of detention warrant issued by the court below due to the defendant's failure to contact with investigative agencies, and the execution of detention warrant issued by the court below without being present at the court below. In addition, considering the motive and background leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.