However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 2016, the Defendant would provide a loan by raising the credit rating of the Party, as a savings bank, through a telephone from a non-name telephone financial fraud operator (hereinafter “C”) (hereinafter “C”) around the end of November 2016.

We listen to the purport that we will collect money from the new passbook and offer it to us. The fact that C knew that she did an act of law such as telephone financing fraud, etc., while having known that she did an act of law such as telephone financing fraud, etc., we thought that she attempted to commit the crime.

Therefore, on December 1, 2016, the above C, called the victim D to call to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office and misrepresented the inspection of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office, and was used for the Internet fraud crime.

The purpose of this paper is to “transfer the amount of deposits in the passbook to which the security account will be opened now is false.”

However, in fact, the above C was not a prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office, but was established under the name of the victim and was not used for fraud, and C was expected to withdraw the deposit of money from the victim to the Defendant's account under the above name and use it in the above telephone financial fraud organization.

Nevertheless, C received KRW 27 million from the victims of the above false statement to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of the Defendant, respectively, from KRW 12:26 to KRW 10 million on the same day, and KRW 15:16 to KRW 17 million on the same day. From around 12:46 on the same day, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 7 million in cash from the offline of the offset, Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, to the F, who is the cause of the telephone financial fraud organization.

Accordingly, the Defendant assisted and facilitate the receipt of property by deceiving the victim by telephone finance assistance staff such as C and F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on response to financial data;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;