beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.07.10 2019고정61

상해

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim were in conflict with each other.

At around 00:30 on July 20, 2018, the Defendant reported female-friendly photographs of a female-friendly body of the victim who had been on his/her strings in his/her face while drinking alcohol with the victim in his/her residence in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju on the ground that he/she had been seen as having been on his/her strings, the Defendant carried out the chest part of the victim's chest at his/her hand on his/her strings, f-7 times the defendant's chest part was pushed down as f-7 times the defendant's chest part was pushed down, f-7 times the defendant's chest part was pushed back with his/her own face, 10 times the defendant's face was reduced to 10 times the victim's face part and chest part, and 2 weeks the victim's chest part was over the left part and the chest part of his/her breast part needed to be treated by the victim at his/her own end.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect C;

1. Medical certificate (Evidence No. 14);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (explosive photo attached to a saw by a victim) (Evidence List No. 15);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of a fine and the suspension of sentence. (30 million won

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act

1. 주장 요지 이 사건 공소사실 중 피고인이 발로 피해자의 정강이 부위를 2-3회 찼다는 것을 제외한 나머지 피고인의 폭행은 모두 사실이 아니고, 피고인이 피해자의 정강이 부위를 찬 것은 피해자의 폭행에 저항하기 위한 정당방위에 해당한다.

2. (1) The witness C made a statement that corresponds to the facts charged in this case in this court, and C received a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million on the ground that he had inflicted an injury on the date and place stated in the facts charged in this case.