[criminal history] On January 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Busan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the former prison on October 28, 2014.

[2] On February 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol at D offices located in Busandong-gu C and D offices located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan; (b) expressed a bath to the F F in order to request the victim E (52 years old)’s wife F to leave the office; (c) the victim was the victim of the victim’s her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

The term "the face of the victim" means "the face of the victim by drinking," and the victim continues to be released from a fine only by the school (correctional institution) in which he/she resides.

The term “the victim’s left eye” refers to a knife inspection led the victim to the real name of the victim by spreading the inside of the left eye, etc.

In this respect, the defendant injured the victim's body and thereby caused the injury to the victim's body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (as at the third public trial date);

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Statement of witness E in the second public trial protocol;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A medical certificate, a medical opinion, a copy of a medical record, and a video CD related to medical treatment;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry into criminal history data, investigation reports (whether a repeated crime is repeated), the current status of expropriation of individuals, and the application of statutes of the judgment;

1. Article 258 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The summary of the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel regarding the assertion of the aggravated repeated crime under Article 35 of the Criminal Act is as follows: (a) the defendant was aware of the victim's face when considering the victim's face; and (b) there was a real name in the victim's inside, but there was no fact that the victim's eye was flicked

Judgment

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence as seen earlier, the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the Defendant.