When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 02:00 on May 23, 2014, the Defendant ordered an entertainment drinking loan in the “G” entertainment drinking house operated by the Victim F in E in the event of a game.

However, in fact, there was no money in the number of the defendants, and even if they drink together with the loan, there was no intention or ability to pay the price or service fee.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with 200,000 won of the market price from the victim, and did not pay 260,000 won in total, including the 200,000 won of the loan and the 200,000 won of the loan and the 60,000 won of the loan.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property and acquired pecuniary benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;