The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of the instant facts charged.

The lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the law or failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, in violation of logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

In addition, the issue of whether to resume the arguments closed by the court is the matter belonging to the court's discretion.

Therefore, the court below rejected the defendant's application for resumption of pleading after the closure of pleading.

there is an error of law in law.

In light of the records, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal. In so doing, it did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.