beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.12.06 2018가단216929

손해배상(언)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relevant Plaintiff of the parties is a person who arranges the 18th and 19th National Assembly members from May 30, 2008 to December 24, 2015.

Defendant B is a person who was a reporter of the media around 2014.

Defendant C is a person who served as a Grade 6 secretary from September 2012 to April 2013.

B. Around November 5, 2014, Defendant B prepared and published an article concerning the Plaintiff in the same content as attached Table 1.

C. Defendant C’s interview and E publication (1) around September 2015, Defendant C had an interview with F on September 2015, and F broadcasted H on G.

(2) Defendant C had an interview with the I press on October 2015.

On October 12, 2015, I media reported the contents of the interview with Defendant C as an article with the same contents as attached Form 2.

(3) On December 2017, the J press reported the content of the interview with the Plaintiff, and it was called “A all members of the Assembly,” a secretary’s monthly attachment case.

(A) The secretary of the instant case is a person who acts as a chief of the organization and secretary of the district party of the former National Assembly member A, and a person who acts as a secretary.

He was in the process of running for the sentence of Gu Council members in the local election in 2014.

Although the K constituency applied for the success, it was recommended as a candidate as a result of the official recruitment examination.

A According to a member of the Assembly, an official ruling has been announced.

3. 16. After 16.C slanders A all members, and is at large.

Defendant C sent the article as “.” From December 5, 2017 to December 5, 2017, Defendant C will put in E in detail between M to a large range of thickness or flob, with the mind that I want to listen to a fluencing fluent fluen in the past, and you want to do so.

It is from the point of view that who is a political marbity crime to the face of the decision.

The article written "," and then linked the above J press articles below.

[Ground of Recognition] Unstrifed Facts, Gap evidence 1, 4, 6, Eul evidence 1

2. The Defendants asserted as follows: (a) prepare articles containing false facts, or interview them; and (b) interview them.