Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate (On the other hand, the defendant asserted that the defendant transferred money from the court of first instance to the post office account with no commission from April 18, 2014 to October 2, 2014 to the post office account with no commission in lump sum to repay its obligations related to the Corporation. However, the defendant's argument that the defendant paid its obligations by transferring the money from the bank account to the post office account with no commission to the post office account at a time during the period from April 18, 2014 to October 2, 2014, Eul, 12, Eul, 16, Eul, and 17, this part of the defendant's appeal 2, regardless of the defendant's allegation that it was made in the name of the court of first instance as to the above case.