2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the instant crime, and the testimony of the Defendant did not have any particular influence on the trial result, is acknowledged as having committed the instant crime, such as the confession of the instant crime, the first offender who did not have any record of criminal punishment, the criminal complaint by inflicting bodily injury from the husband C who was separated from his husband C, and the Defendant

B. However, in full view of the fact that perjury is an act of making it difficult to discover the truth through a trial to force the exercise of the State’s judicial power, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even if considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant as seen earlier.

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.