beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.27 2016고단3386

강제추행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 18, 2016, around 04:55, the Defendant reported that the victim D (a person, a woman, 36 years of age) kids in front of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the street, and the Defendant Daa h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

B. Food

Then, the victim committed an indecent act by force, such as driving on the right chest of the victim’s right chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the witness D in the second public trial protocol;

1. The police statement protocol on D (tentative name) (According to the above macroscopic evidence), where the victim prepares a written statement and where the Defendant is;

한 잔 하자며 말을 걸고, 가라고 하니까 강제로 끌어당기며 몸을 더듬었다고 기재한 사실, 이후 피해자는 경찰에서 진술을 하면서 피고인 갑자기 허리에 손을 두르고 귓속말로 나 먹을래

10 10

the defendant was present on the second public trial of this case, and the victim was present on the date of the second public trial of this case, and the defendant was able to do so.

Republic of Korea Republic of Korea

At this time, the hand has been brought up between them.

a statement may be recognized.

The victim had consistently committed an indecent act from the time of initial report to the time of this Court.

The truth of the victim is recognized as a whole because it is difficult to find special circumstances to make a false statement against the defendant, and the victim's identity is recognized as a whole.

The defendant and the defense counsel stated that the defendant was rhyd in the first written statement prepared by the victim's body, but at the time when the police prepared the statement protocol, the defendant was involved in the chest.

Although the victim made a concrete statement and made a statement that its credibility falls away, the victim stated in this court that the police officer at the time of the instant case had the victim's chest at the time of the instant case, and the defendant also made a statement that the victim was the victim's chest.