B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.

[Defendant B] At around 07:30 on May 2, 2015, the Defendant spent the Si expenses on the ground that he had a passenger car parked near the area of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which had been parked near the area of the victim A at one time, D was pushed down the part of the victim's breast, taken the part of the face, taken the part of the victim's breast at one time, walked the part of the breast, walked the part of the victim's face at one time, and the Defendant, jointly with D, sustained the victim's face, and inflicted an injury on the victim in a two-way pressure and the part that requires approximately 10 days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the police officer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 27 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant A

A. On May 2, 2015, at around 07:30 on May 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) observed a passenger car that was parked near the area C in front of Suwon-si, Suwon-si; and (b) obstructed the victim B ( South, 33 years of age) and the victim D ( South, and 33 years of age) with “if she becomes subject to another call, she would have the victim’s face taken by drinking, and assaulted the victims of her flick, she would have flicked and pusheded the victim B’s flick.

B. Each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to each written agreement attached to the records, each of the above facts charged can be acknowledged that the victim B expressed his/her intent not to be punished against each of the Defendant on August 20, 2015 after the institution of the prosecution of this case, and the victim D expressed his/her intention not to be punished. Thus, each of the above facts charged is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

2. Defendant B A.