However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:50 on March 30, 2014, the Defendant expressed the victim D, a police officer belonging to the Busan District Police Station C District, who called the victim D, who was called the victim D to have the victim returned home to the Defendant, at the time of the victim’s hand, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, etc. of the above D’s crime, by taking the victim’s scam with the victim’s hand at one time by taking the victim’s scam in order for the victim D to have the defendant returned home to the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of statutes on the place of service and the receipt of taxi rate;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (All circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant seems to have committed the instant crime in a contingent manner under the influence of alcohol, the fact that the defendant has no criminal record other than the fine, and the defendant has committed a second offense against his/her own mistake, etc.);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;