소유권보존등기말소 등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except the following parts of the case. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
1 to 16 pages 3 11-16
A. Each registration of preservation of ownership has been completed in the name of the defendant in the name of the Republic of Korea between May 8, 1959 and October 28, 1994, as stated in the claim concerning K (the land before the division into K and H on November 1, 1986, as seen below), W, L, and M among each land of this case, "each registration of preservation of ownership has been completed in the name of the defendant's Republic of Korea from May 8, 1959 to October 28, 1994" shall be construed as "registration of invalidity of cause, and each registration of ownership transfer of the remaining defendants, which was based on it, shall also be the same as the registration of invalidation of cause."
A. Each “Defendant” referred to in paragraphs 5, 8, 9, 10, 21, and 2, and 5 of the 5th page to “Defendant Republic of Korea.”
P. The fifth 6th page “The procedure for the registration of cancellation of each of the registrations of preservation of ownership and transfer of ownership in this case” shall be “the procedure for the registration of cancellation of each of the registrations of preservation of ownership in this case”.
A. Each registration of ownership transfer of this case and each transfer of ownership of this case based on each of the registration registrations in this case shall be deemed to be “each of the registration of ownership transfer of this case” in the 11th and 2th of the 11st page.
A. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.