A. In full view of each of the statements and the whole purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including paper numbers), the plaintiffs and the defendants are attached to the annexed sheet.

2. Based on the share ownership ratio in the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government O 578 square meters, M 174 square meters, N 172 square meters, and 172 square meters (hereinafter “the land 1, 2, and 3”). The land 2 is acknowledged that the buildings owned by the plaintiffs are located on the ground 3rd land, that the buildings owned by the defendant H exist on the third ground, and that the plaintiff A owned No. 4 of the first floor out of the land 1, and that the plaintiff A owned the land 1, 2, and 3 (the plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 2, 1983 as to the share of 26.4/924 of each of the land 1, 2, and 3). The plaintiff and the defendants did not reach an agreement on the method of partition on the land 1, 2, and 3.

B. In light of the aforementioned evidence’s respective shares in sharing between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants, the use of land Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and the ownership of a ground building, etc., it is reasonable to divide the remainder of the shares, excluding No. 2, 3 and 6.4/924 of the Plaintiff A’s shares in the land No. 2, 6, and 1 as indicated in the text.

Attached Form

1. Details of calculation of shares of each defendant in the share sheet shall be as follows:

Attached Form

2. Attached Form 701186, in which the defendant's share is divided

2. A ② Attached Form 184593, moleculor of co-ownership.

2. Annexed shares B: 184593 attached hereto; and

2. Subdivision of H-owned shares 332000 ¡¿ Attached Form.

2. Attached Form 1094014, in which the defendant's share is divided/109

2. Serial 1 through 10)/184800;

2. In conclusion, the order to order the partition of co-owned property as ordered, and the costs of lawsuit are borne individually in light of all the circumstances.