2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는 수사기관 이래 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 ‘ 계단 중간에서 피고인이 피해자의 뺨을 때리고 다리를 걷어찼다’ 고 진술하였고, 목격자인 F도 ‘ 피고인이 피해자의 뺨을 때리고 다리를 걷어차는 것을 보았다’ 고 진술하여 피해자의 진술과 일치하는 점, ② 범행 당일 촬영된 피해자 얼굴에 생긴 상처도 이에 부합하는 점, ③ 피고인은 피해 자로부터 폭행을 당하다가 계단으로 도망가려고 했는데 피해자가 자신의 멱살을 잡아 놓아 주지 않았다고

However, according to the CCTV screen taken by the victim around the scene of the crime, considering the following facts: (a) in light of the fact that the victim was found to have carried the victim’s breath by breathing the Defendant, leading the victim to an emergency stairs; and (b) the defendant led the victim to an attack with an emergency stairs; and (c) as indicated in the instant facts charged, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by taking the victim into account the victim’s bat

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just and there is an error of law by mistake of facts as pointed out by the defendant.

subsection (b) of this section.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.