A. On January 2015, the Plaintiff acquired all the claims and obligations of the legal entity and goodwill of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the non-party. The fact that the price of the goods the legal entity of which was not supplied with the portion of the swine was KRW 70,040,184, was the amount of 70,040,000,000,000,000 won until the time of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity of the legal entity

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total amount of 39,769,864 won (=82,769,864 won - 43,000,000 won) and damages for delay, unless there are special circumstances to the plaintiff.

B. The defendant's defense and its judgment 1) around December 2014, 2014, Eul, an employee of the defendant, introduced the non-party corporation to D with the trade name of "C", and around that time, D deposited 20,000,000 deposit and advance payment of KRW 10,000,000 to the non-party corporation. After the plaintiff acquired all claims and goodwills from the non-party corporation, it was supplied with the non-party corporation. After the plaintiff acquired all claims and goodwills, the plaintiff and the defendant supplied 29,517,880 won such as deposit to D (20,000,000 advance payment of KRW 9,517,880) and the defendant supplied D with the above amount of KRW 29,517,80,00,00 to the non-party corporation, the agreement to deduct the amount to the plaintiff from the goods payment (hereinafter "the agreement of this case").

Since then, the defendant supplied D with satisfaction equivalent to KRW 29,517,880.

Therefore, according to the mutual aid agreement of this case, the defendant must pay to the plaintiff.