beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.27 2015고정1700

모욕

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 20, 2015, the Defendant heard from the victim E, F, etc. before the victim D(58 taxes) house in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju on April 20, 2015.

G 댁네 집에서 꽃나무를 얻어 놔 대문 앞에 심어 놔서 동네 사람들이 모두 예쁘다고

하는데, D이 무슨 오기로 꽃에다 약을 뿌려 죽여 부 렀 는지 모 르 겄네.

she could not sing them;

A bit of bit of bitbit of a bit of a bit.

In a large sense, “the victim was openly insultingd.”

2. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant heard from E, F, etc. at the same place as that of paragraph 1 at around 18:30 on April 22, 2015.

The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to the so-called “N...., who died of the flowers by satising the first agents in the flowers field.”

3. On April 23, 2015, the Defendant is deemed to be a salt disease to the victim while the Defendant hears H, etc. at the same place as Paragraph (1) at around 1, 2015.

This is why it can be said.

D.N.N.N.N.N.D.

b. Mesaly, D. L. L. L. L.W.

It is not possible to write down such clerical error.

Having prevented Chewing test;

A bit of bit of bitbit of a bit of a bit.

In a large sense, “the victim was openly insultingd.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness D, I, E, H, and F;

1. To make a statement to the accused in part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect twice in the second time (including the part concerning examination of the suspect);

1. Each statement in each police statement made to D, I, E, H, J, and F;

1. To describe a report of investigation;

1. On-site photographs (the police of the person who was at the scene at the time of committing three times and the victim’s statement in the court are not consistent, and E, H, and F, a core witness, made a somewhat contradictory statement about the date on which the Defendant took the same desire as the facts charged, in the police and the court.

However, in light of the following circumstances, all statements made by victims, E, H, F, and I are reliable.

The decision is judged.

① The Defendant was the victim.