2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On October 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on the vertebrate No. 2-5 of the 2012, with lusium pain, lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium lusium

B. On October 12, 2012, the Plaintiff was admitted to the D Hospital run by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

C. Around October 23 of the same year, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital inspected the Plaintiff MRI and CT, and as a result of the examination, the prosecutor diagnosedd the Plaintiff with the check of the 5-astronomical chronon attachment No. 2-3, No. 3-4, No. 5-4, and No. 1, No. 2-3-4, the climatic nuclear escape from the climatic chronon, and the climatic chronon attachment No. 2-3, and the pressure check of the climatic chronon.

On October 24, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the Plaintiff’s operation of climatic pressure test (hereinafter “instant operation”), No. 2-3-4, the vertebrate pressure test on both sides, No. 4-5, the vertebrate pressure test (in both sides), No. 5, the 5-3-5, the 000-3, the 5th right side conical pressure test, and the conical signboard saving test (hereinafter “instant operation”).

E. At the time of the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was accompanied by a chronological 5th century, and there was a serious compromise between both sides and the central government, and there was a serious compromise in the astronomical landscape.

F. After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff appealed on the left side of the instant plant at the recovery room, and appealed on the left side of the plant and on the decline in the sense of depreciation.

G. Around October 25, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital observed the progress after prescribing drugs and physical therapy to the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff did not observe the specific shot photographs, while the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital took the RI photographs against the Plaintiff.

H. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital continued to appeal to the left-hand lower-class position, and the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted a fluor test on October 29, 2012, and entrusted the E Hospital to conduct a MaI test and a fluor test, but the MaI test and the fluor test were not found.