When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The Defendant, while operating commercial sex acts in Gangnam-gu Officetel Nos. 522, 605, 615, and 616, advertised on the Internet “C,” etc. and employed D, etc. as female employees.

From the beginning of August 2014 to October 27, 2014, the Defendant engaged in commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts, by having a female employee E and sexual intercourse with a female employee, after receiving KRW 100,00 from the male guest with no name, and providing guidance to the above 615.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D or F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] 19 years of age or older, and brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts in exchange for commercial sex acts, the basic area [6 months to 1 year and 4 months] (the special form of punishment] of the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 14 months] (the decision of sentencing] of the defendant is continued to operate his/her business even after the defendant is controlled by the police;

Reregulation is an unfavorable condition.

On the other hand, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the fact that the defendant is the first offender and is against the defendant, the size of the business establishment of this case, the business period, the age and character of the defendant, the character and conduct, the environment, the motive