A. A. Around May 2013, the Plaintiff had a worker employed by the Defendant, who is employed by the Defendant, engaged in ethyl ethyl assembly work for teaching bridge C among the construction works for building roads B between Gangwon-do roads.

B. The process of assembling ethyl made by Shebridges is to connect about 8-12 meters in length and about 9-16ton with ethyl metropher. The process of assembling ethyl metrophers by linking ethyl to the air, making it up into the air by connecting the ethyl, and then cutting the ethyl team in the same manner, and then repeating the operation of linking the ethyl-pactr with the ethyl-pactr set above the but team by inserting the ethyl-pactr in the same way. In order to connect the ethyl-pactr with the ethyl-pactr, the operation on the ethyl-pactr set up above the butter team shall be carried out.

On May 11, 2013, the Plaintiff was placed on the top of the fourth ethylproplate, which was connected to the Guidein in a state where four ethylproplates were connected to the Guidein, and subsequently ordered the 4th ethylproplate to put the Blux under the 4th ethylproplate, to put the 4th ethyl proplate.

x, however, the article of Cretains the ethyl metret connected to the fourth ethyl display, which led to the fall below approximately five meters, and the plaintiff suffered injury, such as the thalle Ethal thale, etc.

(v) On the other hand, there was no doubt as to whether the Plaintiff was wearing a safety bell at the time of the instant accident, and there was no safety nets, safety boxes, etc. to prevent the Plaintiff from falling around the crashing ethyl compound. The Defendant, including the Plaintiff, issued a specific and direct work instruction to the employees, and conducted safety education, but did not properly conduct safety education.

Grounds for recognition: Gap evidence Nos. 1-4, and Eul.