On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that determined that the act of injury among the facts charged in the instant case constituted a case where there is no proof of crime, and upheld the first instance judgment.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the first instance judgment cited by the lower court in light of the records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Meanwhile, although the prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, the guilty portion is not indicated in the petition of appeal, and the appellate brief does not contain any grounds for objection.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.