When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 22 and 58, 2015, the Defendant, at the front of the C Hospital located in Busan, Busan, and reported to the effect that “the Defendant, who is a taxi passenger, intends to flee without paying the fare,” and the police officer affiliated with the Busan, Busan, Police Station: (a) resolved the problem of taxi fare by leaving the phone to the mother of the Defendant; and (b) took a humping the Defendant into the taxi, and assaulted the Defendant on his hand at one time at the above D’s hand, stating that “I am back to the taxi.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in regard to 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and D;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of a fine (the initial crime, contingent crime, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is insignificant, serious radius);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.