2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the defendant constituted an election commission in a neutral outside person, in violation of the Articles of the Taekwondo Association and the regulations of the Taekwondo Association, and constituted an election commission in the vicinity of F, the former president of the Association.

Election Commission violated the obligation of advance election management in the election of representatives of school groups, and the election management was unfair by G, which is the defendant's former managing director, impliedly approved to engage in an illegal advance election campaign in relation to the election of representatives of school groups.

On April 2016, when the president of the former Association was in office as the president of the Association, the president of the defendant violated the duty to hold concurrent offices by selecting the president of the E Amateur, and the president of the next executive board was elected by presiding a temporary representative meeting without authority.

Therefore, the decision of the 21st president and the 22th general meeting of representatives of the Association Directors, which was implemented by the Defendant on July 13, 2016, on July 22, 2016, contains significant defects and invalidation.

B. We examine the judgment, and there is no evidence to find that there is a serious defect in the resolution of the 21st president and the representative general meeting of the association directors that the defendant implemented on July 13, 2016, and implemented on July 22, 2016. Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are all dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.