Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

1. The defendant A is the representative of the corporation B located in Spocheon City C.

No one shall store dangerous substances of more than the designated quantity in a place other than a storage place or handle them in a place other than a factory, etc., as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

Nevertheless, on December 4, 2015, the Defendant stored and handled BK 505 940 kilograms (type iron container 20 kilograms x 47), BT107 1220 kilograms (type iron container 20 kilograms x 61 x 61) inside the site of a stock company, and B391 1760 kilograms (main steel container 220 kilograms x 8) outside the storage place or factory.

2. Defendant B, a corporation, the purpose of which is to manufacture pro ratas and clothing subsidiary materials, is to manufacture.

The defendant, the representative of the defendant, committed the above violations in relation to the defendant's business at the date and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Reports on violations of fire-fighting-related statutes;

1. Application of related photographic image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 35 Subparag. 1 and Article 5(1) of the Safety Control of Dangerous Substances Act; the selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Articles 38(2), 35 subparag. 1, and 5(1) of the Safety Control of Dangerous Substances Act; selection of fines

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for each of the instant orders for provisional payment is based on the following factors: (a) the Defendants received a completion inspection, including hazardous materials manufacturers, etc.; and (b) circumstances that may be considered in the course of the instant crime, the sentence is determined as ordered