beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.12.05 2014노1261

업무상횡령

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that G is a Chinese citizen and it is difficult to conduct business in Korea. Since the operation of the victim C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "C") whose representative director is the defendant, there were problems, such as opinions about the management of the company between the defendant and the defendant, G adjusted the same business relationship with the defendant. After examining the details of the use of the corporate card during the period of operation of the company on behalf of the defendant, the defendant knew of the fact that he used the corporate card without being too heavy, weekend, and night, he filed a complaint with the defendant for embezzlement of his business and submitted the detailed statement of the corporate account which confirms the use of the above corporate card as relevant evidence; the defendant paid food, screen golf course usage cost, rain or use cost as the above corporate card; the remaining usage of the corporate card as the welfare expenses for his own employees; the defendant's purchase of the corporation's mobile phone usage within the scope of 360 percent of the total rent-free shop; the details of the user's use of the corporation card and its employees.