The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendants are married.

On October 20, 2014, on the grounds that Defendant B and Defendant B used alcohol together with Defendant A, on the front side of the E-way located in Chicago-si, on October 22:15, 2014, on the ground that Defendant B used to drink with Defendant A at the time of assault with Defendant A at the time of assault with F’s her hand, Defendant B committed the act of Defendant B at the same time, and Defendant B was aware of the attitude that Defendant B would have committed an act of Defendant B at the same time, and that Defendant A conspired with Defendant A and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by a police officer in charge of the report of 112 cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;