A. On November 23, 201, the Plaintiff complained of the clothes around 19:00 on November 23, 201, and applied to the emergency room of the hospital operated by the Defendant Corporation. 2) The medical personnel belonging to the Defendant Corporation diagnosed the Plaintiff’s sick name as an acute dymaritis on the basis of the results of the CT photographing conducted around 17:28 on the same day.

At the time of extracting, the state of the plaintiff who has a multiple opinions, such as side fluorries in the substance of extracting, dysium around the extracting site, drug treatment, etc., and the degree of observation of progress, which is not a serious state in need of external treatment such as surgery.

3) On November 24, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) returned home on the recommendation for hospitalization of the medical staff belonging to the Defendant Corporation; (b) returned home on November 24, 201, around 01:00; (c) on the same day, at around 06:23, 06:23, the Plaintiff complained of the cRP (infection) and hospitalized again to B Hospital; (d) despite the Plaintiff’s result of the Plaintiff’s blood examination on November 25, 201, 201, cRP (in fact 3.5-10); (c) on November 26, 201, cRP (infect 0-0; 0.5) increased the volume of cRP (infectumo) and continued to increase the volume of dives.

However, medical personnel belonging to the defendant corporation did not conduct CT photographing tests, etc. to verify the status of the plaintiff.

5) On November 30, 201, the number of medical personnel belonging to the Defendant Corporation was increased as a result of the second CT photographing test conducted on November 30, 201, and CRP was also increased. While the medical personnel belonging to the Defendant Corporation recommended the surgery, the Plaintiff was employed for each of them, and the medical personnel belonging to the Yangsan National University was transferred to the Yangsan National University Hospital on December 1, 201. 6) on December 2, 2011, the medical personnel belonging to the Yangsan National University Hospital performed the surgery with the Plaintiff.

As a result of the opening of the plaintiff's dog, multiple number of the plaintiff's dogmatics were raised, the gate infection was serious, a large quantity of liquid was collected in the dub, and the body was spreaded by the middle to the middle, and the annual organization cannot be found of the normal autopsy structure due to melting symptoms.