However, the period of each of the crimes in this case is less than four days, and the profits earned by the defendant are not high, and the defendant has no record of crime, and the defendant recognizes and reflects the mistake, etc., which are favorable to the defendant.

However, each of the crimes of this case is that each of the crimes of this case is engaged in general game providing business by setting up two game apparatuses for physical posters, which are game products not rated in the party room operated by the defendant, and providing them for use by customers without permission, setting up one game machine for 2010 which is run by providing them for use by customers. In light of the contents of the crime, the liability for the crime is not easy, but is not easy.

Considering the fact that the lower court sentenced a sentence that has been mitigated than the fine amount of the summary order (3 million won), and all other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, are considered, the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.