난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on October 7, 201 as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Man (hereinafter “Man”) and applied for the recognition of refugee to the Defendant on November 1, 201, after entering the Republic of Korea on a short-term comprehensive (C-3 and 30 days of sojourn) status.
B. The Defendant, on May 23, 2013, promulgated with sufficient grounds for gambling [the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; the same applies hereinafter] to the Plaintiff.
) On the ground that Article 2 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist, a disposition not to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) was made.
C. On June 27, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on June 27, 2013, but the said objection was dismissed on April 11, 2014.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2 and Eul evidence 1, 2, and 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole arguments and arguments
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff alleged that the Plaintiff believed Islamic intercourse with his family in the highest direction with the Manddo, and that, around 2009, from the Furst Qumin Qumo, “it does not state any falsehood without accompanying any falsehood and does not commit any crime, and does not commit any crime at all times, she moved into a church with the Plaintiff going through the church.”
However, since the mother and two siblings believe Islamic teachers have been married to sacrhy, the Plaintiff threatened with the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff, on the grounds that the Plaintiff got married to sacrhy, and the Plaintiff got out of sacrhy as well as sacrhy.
On June 2010, a large amount of punishment around 2010 continued to be a threat to the plaintiff's house in Cokea, which led to the plaintiff's departure from Korea.
Therefore, in the event that the plaintiff returns to her mother on religious grounds, he/she is likely to be stuffed by her mother and 2.