손해배상(기)
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 7,000,000 to Plaintiff A, and as to this, the period from November 17, 2017 to May 16, 2019.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The relationship between the parties 1) Defendant C Association (hereinafter “Defendant C Association”)
(2) Defendant D is a cooperative established pursuant to the Small and Medium Enterprise Cooperatives Act for the purpose of carrying out collaborative projects by promoting the sound development of the F business and G business for manufacturing, and the promotion of mutual welfare among its members, whose main business is manufacturing, using Daegu Metropolitan City as its business area. (2) Defendant D is working as the president at the Defendant Cooperative from March 2013 to March 2013.
3) Plaintiff A, a member of Defendant Union, is Plaintiff B (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”).
(2) The Defendant D, as the president of the Defendant Union, convened an emergency board of directors on December 30, 2015 (hereinafter “Board of Directors”) as the de facto operator and internal director of the Defendant Union from October 2014 to January 20, 2016. (2) Defendant D, as the director of the Defendant Union, proposed the expulsion of Plaintiff A, a member of the Plaintiff association, through the special meeting of the Defendant Union, on the ground that the Plaintiff filed a civil petition with the Daegu Metropolitan City on the ground that the Plaintiff would not properly handle the matters pointed out by the H organization and the auditors, and that the Plaintiff B, a member of the Plaintiff, was bankrupt.
On January 20, 2016, the defendant D, the president of the defendant association, and the 10 executive directors of the defendant association, who attended the above emergency meeting, decided to refer the case of expulsion of plaintiff B to the above special meeting.
2) On January 20, 2016, the Defendant Union (hereinafter “instant special general meeting”) is an extraordinary general meeting of its members (hereinafter “instant general meeting”).
(2) The resolution of expulsion against Plaintiff B, a member of the association (hereinafter “the resolution of expulsion of this case”).
(2) On the same day, the expulsion disposition against Plaintiff B (hereinafter “instant expulsion disposition”) was based on the instant expulsion resolution.
AB made it.
The contents discussed as the reason for expulsion of Plaintiff B in the special meeting of this case are as follows.