A. On February 25, 2020, at around 09:30, the Defendant requested the victim D, a workplace partner, to perform business affairs concerning the purchase and disbursement of the elderly goods, but the Defendant publicly insultd the victim by publicly alleging that “the victim must proceed with the contract with a growing amount,” while the victim was heard by a large number of employees, the victim’s “the thalthm of weather, weather, and ethm of the ethm of the ethm of the ethm of the ethm of the ethm of the ethm of the ethm of the ethm of the eth, and the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth, the eth of the eth of the eth.

B. At around 15:45 on August 12, 2020, the Defendant listened to the phrase “A” that the said victim D wishes to investigate the status of river damage, and she also listened to the victim’s attendance of a large number of employees.

The lower court publicly insulting the victims of sexual harassment by stating that they had never been reclaimed from the beginning, and that they would have been drinking anywhere, a pair of years, a year in which they have not been recovered, a year in which they should be raised anywhere, and a pair of years will return to the office well.

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the statement of “written application for withdrawal of complaint and non-prosecution of punishment,” which is bound in the trial records, the victim’s withdrawal of complaint against the defendant on February 2, 2021, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.