약정금
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Facts of premise;
A. The Plaintiff Company (formerly, D Co., Ltd.) is a corporation that runs the taxi transport business, and the Plaintiff B is the current representative director of the Plaintiff Company, and the Defendant was the former representative director of the Plaintiff Company.
1. The plaintiff company shall pay the total amount of value-added tax reductions incurred from July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004 to the members of the association by lump sum payment, in accordance with the basic principles of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act and the Ministry of Construction and Transportation guidelines.
The amount of value-added tax reduced after January 1, 2005 shall be paid in cash to the members of the Tong or himself/herself as of the 22th day of each month.
2. The cooperative members shall pay 75,000 won in cash to the cooperative members or the principal on the 22th day of each month until the administrative disposition is transferred.
B. On June 21, 2005, when the Defendant was in office as the representative director of the Plaintiff Company, E-Subdivision, the Plaintiff Company and the Plaintiff Company’s labor union, has reduced a certain portion of the amount of value-added tax payable for the general taxi transport business entity under the Passenger Transport Service Act after July 2004, and had the Plaintiff use the reduced amount for the improvement of treatment and welfare of general taxi transport business entities, in accordance with the provisions of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act at that time, a written labor-management agreement regarding the payment method
(hereinafter “instant labor-management agreement”). C.
Plaintiff
The members of the company filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff company seeking payment of the agreed amount under the labor-management agreement of this case (this Court 2010Gahap22772, 2008Gabu24781, 2008Gabu24080, etc.). The plaintiff company received a judgment in favor of the plaintiff company that "the plaintiff company shall pay to the members of the plaintiff company an agreed amount equivalent to a certain amount of value-added tax reduction according to the labor-management agreement of this case," and the amount of value-added tax with the plaintiff company.