A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles only requested security service companies to protect their personal safety, and there is no fact that the Defendants forced the employees of security service companies to enter the chip to the IMO and instigated them to assault the believers belonging to the IMO.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts charged and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentencing (Defendant A: fine of KRW 5 million, Defendant B, and C: fine of KRW 800,000,000 for each of the 8 million penalties, Defendant D: fine of KRW 2.5 million) on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, following the death of G, some new maps including the Defendants were divided into 10 p.m., and they attempted to enter the IAEA in H on April 9, 2012 on the ground that the Defendants conducted cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptive cryptives.

According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants refused the entry of the IMO to the Defendants.