(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

(b)Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

1. Defendant A is a multi-level seller who, from January 7, 201, sells a multi-level marketing system, such as mobile phones, to multi-level marketing organizations, as the representative of (ju) B, a multi-level marketing organization, which is a multi-level marketing organization, established, managed, and operated a multi-level marketing organization.

A multi-level marketing seller shall not impose a burden of at least 50,00 won per year on a person who intends to become a multi-level marketing salesperson or multi-level marketing salesperson, such as excessive purchase of goods, subject to the application of standards for paying bonuses in favor

Nevertheless, around August 20, 2012, the Defendant purchased 30,000 PV from the above state office to E, and immediately joined the class of de factoman. In order to engage in the class of de factoman and to join the position of at least five salespersons, the Defendant shall be classified as a dud class, and may receive support allowances from that time.” The Defendant purchased ESE’s mobile phone of 822,800 won to the above state office, and then joined it as a multi-level marketing salesperson of de facto class.

In addition, from that time to September 7, 2012, the Defendant purchased a mobile phone of 496,171,000 won in total from 555 times in the same manner as the attached crime list, and then joined as multi-stage salesmen.

2. As stated in paragraph (1), Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, intended to become multi-level marketing salespersons with respect to multi-level marketing of the Defendant’s communications equipment, or a multi-level marketing salesperson, was negligent in exercising due care and supervision to prevent such violation, even though the Defendant’s representative, subject to the application of the payment standards for excessive goods such as registration, maintenance of qualifications, or favorable support allowances.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Door-to-door sales, etc.: