beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.05.18 2017고단1124

주택법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant operated an illegal resale company (one person: several persons) with the trade name of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L-7143.

No person shall acquire or have others acquire the supply of any deed, status or housing constructed or supplied pursuant to the Housing Act by fraudulent or other unlawful means.

Upon the commencement of the sale procedure of the apartment apartment apartment apartment in the Namyang-si, Nam-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant prepared a special supply procedure for the persons with disabilities who are homeless and are issued the registration certificate pursuant to the Welfare of Persons with Disabilities Act, which is separate from the general supply division, using the fact that the winning rate is higher than that of the general supply division, the Defendant offered a special supply share by lending the name of the disabled and then acquired profits from resale by selling the apartment unit after the lapse of one year, a period of restriction on resale when the winning results are achieved. In collusion with F, G, H, I, and J, the Defendant prepared funds such as down payment and down payment for the expansion of cryn construction to be paid when concluding a contract under the name of the disabled, and F, G, and H will invite the persons with disabilities to receive the subscription on behalf of the disabled, and I, and J decided to act on behalf of the disabled persons who will receive the subscription.

On May 31, 2016, when the receipt of an apartment application was commenced in the "E Model E-Sure" located in K at the Namyang-si, Nam-si, the F lent the name of the disabled L, M, N, G lent the name of the disabled, G lent the name of the disabledO, P, and Q, H recruited the I, J, etc. to act on behalf of these disabled persons, and the books of receipt, including I and J, received KRW 10,000 per day from H and received the special apartment purchase application as the representative of the disabled persons recruited by F and G.

On June 9, 2016, when six persons with disabilities who borrowed their name from around the name of around 2016 won won all the winning, the Defendant had the above persons with disabilities around June 14, 2016.