A. Defendant A-misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, and misunderstanding of legal principles, or misunderstanding of the legal principles, etc., the Defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim by walking the victim’s knee, or by walking the victim’s knee.

Even if the defendant's knee of the victim's knee is a knee of the victim, he does not have any relation with the knee of the victim's knee.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found this part of the facts charged guilty is erroneous or erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the crime of injury.

2) Even if all facts charged against the defendant were found guilty, the sentence of the lower court against the defendant (two years of suspended sentence of October and one hundred and sixty hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B - The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) against the wrongful Defendant in sentencing is excessively unreasonable.

(c)

In light of various circumstances, such as the nature or risk of each of the crimes of this case which are unfair sentencing (as against Defendant A), the circumstances after the crime, the recovery of damage, and the criminal records of the defendant, the punishment of the court below against the defendant A is unreasonable because it is excessively unfeasible.

2. Determination

A. On July 30, 2017, Defendant A’s assertion of misunderstanding of the facts or misapprehension of the legal doctrine, the summary of Defendant A’s public lawsuit room was inflicted on the victim F (26 years of age) who was the said main guest, prior to the above main guest toilet around July 30, 2017, on the ground that Defendant F (26 years of age) was prevented from assaulting the above E. As above, the victim’s knife floor was boomed on the victim’s knee part, and the victim’s knee part was kneefe at one time, and the victim suffered injury, such as knife, which was six weeks prior to the victim’s treatment.

2) The judgment of the court below - The court below convicted the above charged facts for the following reasons.

(1) A witness G shall have no special reason to suspect the statement of a victim.