1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant B’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged against Defendant B was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal, exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience, and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation, or by violating the principle

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the records, it is just to maintain the judgment of the court of first instance that acquitted Defendant DC of the facts charged in this case on the grounds that the facts charged in this case against Defendant DC constituted a case without proof of facts charged. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by violating logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.