When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 17:30 on January 27, 2016, the Defendant stated that the victim D (Woo, 76 years of age) residing in the vicinity of Pyeongtaek-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, would not properly manage the chickens that he would enter the Defendant’s garden, and that the victim was suffering from emotional injury on the ground that he would not properly manage the chickens that he would cause him to enter the Defendant’s garden, and that “the victim would dys why he would dys why he would dys why he would dys his house,” and that “the victim would dys why she would dys and fys his head,” and that the victim was suffering from bodily injury, such as brain sys, which requires medical treatment for about 21 days, in drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. In light of the investigation report (related to attachment of a medical certificate of injury), investigation report (related to the situation of injury, etc.), investigation report (related to the change of the name of a suspect A), and investigation report (related to the change of the name of the victim), the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was only the fact of harming the victim, and that there was no fact of causing injury to the victim as stated in the facts charged. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment, i.e., the credibility of the statement as to the circumstances and details of the victim is relatively consistent and specific, the victim was damaged and reported to the police at the time of 20 minutes. The victim appears to have been provided with medical treatment at the hospital on January 29, 2016, and the victim was issued with a medical certificate after being provided with medical treatment at the hospital on January 29, 2016. The victim's part and degree of the injury stated therein correspond to the victim's statement

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so ordered in consideration of the fact that the defendant deposits 100,000 won for the victim for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.