2. The judgment is recognized that the defendant repents his mistake, and that the defendant's health status is not good.

However, considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crimes, even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime including his previous conviction, and did not recover from damage to the conviction of the same crime, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence after the crime, it is deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.