2. The judgment that the defendant recognized his mistake, the fact that there is no previous conviction beyond the fine is favorable to the defendant, but there is a need to strictly punish the defendant as committing the crime of this case without permission, such as taking a person or a private life for the purpose of profit-making, and collecting the victims' location information or investigating their privacy for more than 50 persons for more than one year by employing 20 employees and using them to track their location, and committing the crime of this case during the repeated crime period. The defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period. The defendant had already been punished as the same crime during the repeated crime period, and immediately went to the crime of this case even if he was arrested on August 2, 201 and was first sentenced to a fine on August 4, 201, and was dismissed by the prosecutor's request for detention warrant, and other circumstances, such as the crime of this case, which led to the crime of this case, and the motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the defendant's occupation, circumstances and circumstances, etc.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.

(However, as the reasoning of the judgment of the court below is clearly stated that "the choice of punishment is omitted" in the following "Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure" is amended ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.