A. The land in this case is jointly owned by Plaintiff 1/2 and Defendants 1/6 shares, respectively, in the forest E-Gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do. (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. The Plaintiff demanded the Defendants to divide the land of this case, but no agreement was reached between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the division method until the date of closing the argument of this case.

[Grounds for recognition] Evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In full view of all the circumstances, such as the location, land size, accessibility, and the number of shares held by the original and the Defendant of the instant land. In particular, if the instant land is partitioned as indicated in paragraph 1 of the Disposition, it is reasonable to divide the instant land in kind, inasmuch as economic value is almost the same among each divided land, thereby promoting equity among the original and the Defendant.

3. In conclusion, we decide to divide the land of this case as above and decide as per Disposition.