However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No passenger shall assault others on an airplane, or commit violence, intimidation or deceptive means, or manipulate the entrance, emergency exit and devices, which obstruct the security or flight of an airplane.

On July 2, 2018, the Defendant started from the Incheon International Airport located in Jung-gu Incheon Airport to 272, and started from the Incheon International Airport to Nataea International Airport in Japan, and refused to provide an additional explanation by stating that “I do not need to hear that I would be able to get informed of the duty of 15F passengers, the emergency seat of the aircraft crew D,” and that “I would be able to get informed of the duty of 15F passengers, the aircraft crew of the above aircraft,” and the victim E, the aircraft security personnel of the above aircraft, as the cabin crew who reported this, should be able to hear the fact that the Defendant could not properly perform the duty of Do and emergency seat passengers, and the Defendant would be able to leave the seat without starting within 5 minutes “the victim.”

"Along with sound, in his hand, the victim's right-hand fingers by cutting the victim's jackets and walking the victim's upper mouths at one time, and the driver divided the knife for opening an emergency exit on the right-hand side of the seat into a knife.

Accordingly, the defendant committed violence that obstructs the security and operation of aircraft.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. On-site measures taken by employees F on-the-spot of Company B, which are submitted by the F in writing;

1. Emergency exit photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the video;

1. Article 46 (1) and Articles 23 (2) of the Aviation Security Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and Articles 46 (1) and 23 (2) of the same Act

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code provides that the defendant reflects his wrong behavior and does not repeat again in the future, and the defendant is not mentally healthy due to depression, etc.