If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Defendants are willing to engage in sexual traffic brokerage business together, Defendant B paid funds necessary for the business, and Defendant A shared a mutual role in operating the actual business.

On August 9, 2018, the Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts by obtaining 100,000 won from many and unspecified men and by allowing the said male to have a sexual intercourse with female employees in the Suwon-si District Ctel D and E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. Each written statement of the F and Defendant A;

1. Application of Part II Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and contracts;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, choice of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic)

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of a suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (limited to imprisonment);

1. Defendant B of the community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act committed by the Defendants in collusion with each other to arrange and arrange sexual traffic. The crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. is highly likely to be subject to criticism and punishment in that the commission of the commercialization of sex causes distortion of the sex culture and impedes the sound sexual awareness of society.

Defendant

B, first of all, proposed the criminal act to Defendant A and led it.

In addition, on July 2, 2018, the above defendant committed the crime of this case, which is the same kind of crime, without being aware immediately after being discovered by engaging in the brokerage business of sexual traffic. The above defendant committed the crime of this case on July 2, 2019.