However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 21, 2017, around 19:00, the Defendant: (a) gets off the front of the Gangnam-gun C road in front of the Southern Jin-gun around 19:00, and (b) Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Ln Don Don Ln Don Don Don Don Ln Don Don

“A dangerous article loaded on a cargo vehicle (74 cm in total length) with a fluorial bag (74 cm in total) and fluorial hand, the victim’s left side shouldered once, and the victim suffered injury, such as a part of the left-hand part in need of approximately three weeks’ medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The accusation letter of D (including the injury diagnosis certificate attached thereto);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (referring to attaching photographs used in violence and attaching photographs to damaged site photographs);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the following grounds for sentencing);

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentencing elements of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and all the conditions of the sentencing indicated in the pleadings shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors:

The factors of sentencing in favor of the defendant: The defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is relatively not more severe, the defendant is a contingent crime that is disputed with the victim and water problem, only the defendant has the same criminal record and has been punished once by a fine, the victim has been deposited with the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the victim and the person who is the person who is the person who is the person

In this case, the crime of this case is inserted into the iron system, which is a dangerous object.