명예훼손
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) around 17:00 on June 28, 2015, at the ASEAN City Community Center; and (b) the fact that the victim D embezzled acquisition tax at the time of trading the village site; (c) despite the fact that there was no embezzlement of the victim D’s acquisition tax; (d) the residents of the community, who are 10 residents of the community, embezzled the acquisition tax and the purchase price of the community hall site; and (e) the Nonparty dismissed this Chapter; and (e) whether E would not be able
The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as giving one copy of the case he created to the village residents and giving one copy of the case to the village residents.
2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution;
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act);
B. Withdrawal of wishing to punish the victim after the indictment of this case
C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)