beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2013.05.29 2013고단265

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that A, an employee of the Defendant, violated the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority in operating B vehicles on the front side of the Gyeong Highway Seoul, 359.5km point 359 km, around November 18, 1993, at around 10:37, with respect to the Defendant’s business.

Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of March 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of January 5, 1995), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, has lost its effect due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality on December 29, 201.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The Institute of Jind Co., Ltd.