A. Of each land listed in the separate sheet 1, 3, the attached sheet 64, 65, 66, 67, and 64 shall apply respectively.

A. From the end of December, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the attached list 1,021 square meters of the leased deposit for KRW 20 million and KRW 1,021 square meters of the leased deposit for the lease of KRW 1,021 square meters of the attached Table 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 60, 61, 62, 63, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 54 in sequence, among the real estate listed in the attached Table 3, and the real estate listed in the attached Table 3 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. On December 30, 2017, the Defendant received the instant warehouse and land from the Plaintiff.

C. From February 10, 2018, the Defendant agreed to pay monthly rent to the Plaintiff on February 10, 2010, and the same year as of February 10, 2018.

3.0. The rent was paid on October 10, and thereafter was delayed.

On June 4, 2018, the complaint of this case, containing the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the delay in the payment of rent two or more times by the Defendant, was served on the Defendant.

E. On the other hand, on the ground of the instant land, there is a ground-based assembly-type warehouse that connects each point of 72,73, 74, 75, and 72 on the part of 14 square meters in the ship, which connects each point of 68, 69, 70, 71, and 68 of the attached Table 1 to the appraisal map installed by the Defendant, with the same appraisal map attached to each point of 68, 69, 70, 71, and 68, and the same appraisal map to each point of 72, 73, 74, 75, and 72 on the part of 47 square meters in the ship, and the same appraisal map to each point of 76, 77, 78, 79, and 76 square meters in order (hereinafter referred to as “instant warehouse, etc.”).

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 1-2, 3, Gap evidence 2 and 3-2, and the result of this court's request for surveying and appraisal of remaining Yangyang-gu storages in the Republic of Korea, the judgment as to the ground for appeal as a whole.

A. According to the above facts of recognition, the instant lease agreement is the defendant.