beta
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2017.08.17 2017가합10177

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against Plaintiff A and B each of KRW 101,603,477, and Plaintiff C’s KRW 5,000,000 and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: non-strifeed facts, Gap evidence 1 through 8 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply);

(2) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleading

A. The status of the parties (1) The Plaintiff A and B are the parents of the deceased I (Jeds; hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Plaintiff C is the parents of the deceased.

(2) On August 10, 2016, Defendant D is the representative of the K Child Care Center (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”) where Defendant D is a person driving a Lone Star Motor Vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) which is a school bus of the instant Child Care Center on August 10, 2016, and Defendant E is the principal of the instant Child Care Center with his father.

Defendant F is the owner of the instant vehicle with Defendant D’s children, and Defendant G and H are the child care teachers of the instant childcare center.

B. (1) Around 09:15 on August 10, 2016, Defendant D driven the instant vehicle and arrived at the instant child-care center parking lot located in Emhhh, and left after getting off the child-care center students. Defendant D left back without finding that the Plaintiff was on the rear side of the instant vehicle, and caused the Plaintiff to die with the rear wheeler with the rear wheeler, and then died of the Plaintiff due to brain damage around 09:26 on the same day.

(2) At the time of the instant accident, Defendant G was in charge of the vehicle instruction to have the instant vehicle moved along with the originals, and Defendant H was in charge of the vehicle instruction to have the originals of the instant vehicle moved out from Defendant G to the child care center.

Defendant G: (a) left a child at the instant parking lot for childcare centers; (b) delivered the child to Defendant H by directly delivering the child to Defendant H without verifying that the child was entering the child care center; (c) boarded the instant vehicle to help other originals of the child care center; and (d) although Defendant H knew that the child was deprived, Defendant G entered the child care center.