도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On April 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Busan District Court on April 17, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 25, 2013, and is currently under suspended sentence.
"2014 Highest 735"
1. Around 16:00 on March 10, 2014, the Defendant driven a car cren car at a section of about 30 km in the direction of the Yeongdeungpo-dong Highway at the time of the Gyeonggi-do Highway, which is located, without a driver’s license, from around 92 km.
2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, driving the said vehicle without purchasing the mandatory insurance for automobiles at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).
"2014 Highest 807"
1. On January 27, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) without obtaining a driver’s license on a motor vehicle on or around 10:00, the Defendant driven a Crens car at a section of about 2 km from the day on which it was located in the Sindong-dong, Busan Metropolitan City to the annual day market of the same Sindong-dong.
2. Although a person violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the Defendant operated the Karen motor vehicle as above at the date and place specified in paragraph (1).
around 09:01 on January 3, 2014, the Defendant, “2014 Highest 962,” connected to the PC located in the Seosan-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, to the Internet “D” and posted a letter stating “Addi E” to be “Adi.e., the company needsing to be engaged in the steering station.” On the one hand, the Defendant told the victim F who reported and contacted the above letter to send 300,000 won as the introduction fee to the victim F.
However, even if the defendant receives the introduction fee from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the employee to work at the scene where the victim work.
Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it on the 15th of the same month from the victim.